jackrabbit-oak-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Julian Reschke <julian.resc...@gmx.de>
Subject Re: JCR<->MK property mapping
Date Wed, 25 Apr 2012 10:01:46 GMT
On 2012-04-25 11:48, Felix Meschberger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am 25.04.2012 um 11:40 schrieb Jukka Zitting:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 9:54 AM, Julian Reschke<julian.reschke@gmx.de>  wrote:
>>> Would it make sense to "optimize" the persistence in that we wouldn't store
>>> the primary type when it happens to be nt:unstructured?
>>
>> Yes, though the default type should be something like
>> "oak:unstructured" or "jr3:unstructured"  that isn't orderable like
>> "nt:unstructured".
>
> Do we need a namespace ? How about just "Unstructured" ?

a) I wouldn't be surprised if there's code out there assuming that 
namespace names are always prefixed.

b) Having "nt:unstructured" and "Unstructured" be different is ... 
surprising. So we probably want a different term...


Mime
View raw message