Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-jackrabbit-oak-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-oak-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A13939ED8 for ; Fri, 23 Mar 2012 17:58:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 45702 invoked by uid 500); 23 Mar 2012 17:58:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-oak-dev-archive@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 45666 invoked by uid 500); 23 Mar 2012 17:58:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact oak-dev-help@jackrabbit.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: oak-dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list oak-dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 45657 invoked by uid 99); 23 Mar 2012 17:58:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Mar 2012 17:58:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of justinedelson@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.170 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.170] (HELO mail-wi0-f170.google.com) (209.85.212.170) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Mar 2012 17:58:03 +0000 Received: by wibhr17 with SMTP id hr17so2015719wib.1 for ; Fri, 23 Mar 2012 10:57:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=PGgyeWOP+VsdOpPsKuDoKpS0nScmnqVe6ONAKpNE+IA=; b=lZGCO4xTYqt+CQIfvXQupHuIJq7NdSuWFgf+FtX5kHhKI9QFTy6c3KuBeT/DsBmuN+ RbkusjjpzawQXarZDm3Ydtn8OVaoDo/77au6pp1Zs+49L7YXOeXplMmKrMa3JW6u+NKF l4M2ZDsnMeW03a6lXP6qIzJM/EYPgTVqhuckFVprih1XmXgyKKFsHpr8lEaT2KSESs9e 9cBU8Z5ehlGrj1C4fV4YNenUy/xQubRiPKW4nMPOjeq3tZstt3hpyNVeFLw+35kuXmsj EOZyIStguwrVNNpL1iaFydzez1AdIpfhLw05jR+awSpexWmURTrstCnKuryIEYzm0Vx3 nAAQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.180.95.34 with SMTP id dh2mr8517192wib.15.1332525463346; Fri, 23 Mar 2012 10:57:43 -0700 (PDT) Sender: justinedelson@gmail.com Received: by 10.180.164.13 with HTTP; Fri, 23 Mar 2012 10:57:43 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2012 13:57:43 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: nSMvmzdi5ochy1iPs-g_6wc6Qj4 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Re (OAK-36) Implement a query parser - what about indexing? From: Justin Edelson To: oak-dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d04448035e59dc404bbecc2cc X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --f46d04448035e59dc404bbecc2cc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 5:40 AM, Ard Schrijvers wrote: > > Although I am on thin ice here, I think there are hardly any noSQL > stores out there that actually include full text indexes. Yes, but the goal of Oak explicitly says "The implementation should provide more out-of-the-box functionality than typical NoSQL databases while achieving comparable levels of scalability and performance." > I think we > shouldn't try to address it in the repository, but rather provide some > tooling to easily setup a (external) full text index (like plain > Lucene, or use Solr/Elastic search) according someones exact needs > (like, which analyzer to use for which part of the content, which > properties should be stored, which properties should be analyzed in > which ways, which properties are meant for TrieRanges, etc etc) > I agree that for many use cases a separate index is appropriate. That doesn't obviate the need/appropriateness for an internal full-text search index. Justin > > Regards Ard > > > > > [1]: > > > http://wiki.apache.org/jackrabbit/Goals%20and%20non%20goals%20for%20Jackrab > > bit%203 > > > > Regards, > > Thomas > > > --f46d04448035e59dc404bbecc2cc--