jackrabbit-oak-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Michael Dürig <mdue...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Javadoc: {@code...} instead of <code/>?
Date Thu, 15 Mar 2012 15:44:32 GMT

FWIW: I switched to {@code} in the org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.jcr package 
space.

Michael

On 15.3.12 16:10, Stefan Guggisberg wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 3:59 PM, Felix Meschberger<fmeschbe@adobe.com>  wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Am 15.03.2012 um 15:46 schrieb Michael Dürig:
>>
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> What do people feel about using {@code null} instead of
>>> <code>null</code>  in javadoc? Personally I prefer the second one
since
>>> it is lighter on the eye but don't have a strong opinion. I think
>>> however we should use all the same format.
>>
>> I didn't know the {@code} tag exists so I always use the<code>...</code>
 style.
>
> same here. i realize that i am getting old;)
> i kind of like the {@code} variant but i don't feel strong either way.
>
> cheers
> stefan
>
>>
>>  From a formatting POV (allowing to format segments with tags different from<code>)
it might really make sense to use the tag instead of the html element.
>>
>> Regards
>> Felix

Mime
View raw message