jackrabbit-oak-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Julian Reschke (Commented) (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (OAK-19) Consolidate JSON utilities
Date Fri, 16 Mar 2012 09:27:40 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-19?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13230990#comment-13230990
] 

Julian Reschke commented on OAK-19:
-----------------------------------

+1

We also should make a conscious decision about whether we really do JSON, or just use JSON-like
syntax. In the former case, we need to eliminate all stuff that is not really guaranteed by
JSON (as defined in RFC 4627), such as the ordering of members being considered relevant.
                
> Consolidate JSON utilities
> --------------------------
>
>                 Key: OAK-19
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-19
>             Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>          Issue Type: Task
>          Components: core, jcr
>            Reporter: angela
>
> i seems confusing to me that we are having multiple different json utilities in the
> current oak stack:
> - a dependency to google-json 
> - a complete json utility including parser, json abstraction in oak-jcr (org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.jcr.json)
> - another json utility in org.apache.jackrabbit.mk.json containing tokenizer et. al.
> imo we should only have one single json utility and i would therefore suggest that
> we discuss this issue and try to reach a consensus which json-library we want to use.
> what do you think?

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Mime
View raw message