+1 for adding some tooling that verifies all of this.

I see OAK-1362 is closed, shouldn't we open a dedicated issue for this?


On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 12:21 PM, Jukka Zitting <jukka.zitting@gmail.com> wrote:

On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 6:04 AM, Alex Parvulescu
<alexparvulescu@apache.org> wrote:
> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Jackrabbit 2.7.4.

    [x] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit 2.7.4

On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 1:09 PM, Tobias Bocanegra <tripod@apache.org> wrote:
> I'm a bit concerned about your change in http://svn.apache.org/r1565601 where
> you moved the AbstractLazyIterator to jcr-commons from oak but didn't increase
> exported OSGi package version in the org.apache.jackrabbit.commons.iterator
> package.

A good example of why the kind of tooling suggested in OAK-1362 would be useful.

> In order to define the proper package imports for oak, I suggest that we
> increase the package version from 2.3 to 2.3.1

IIUC 2.4 would be the correct version here. Again, determining the
correct version changes would be easier with better tooling.


Jukka Zitting