jackrabbit-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Julian Reschke <julian.resc...@gmx.de>
Subject Re: Jackrabbit-trunk - Build # 2155 - Still Unstable
Date Wed, 24 Jul 2013 11:32:14 GMT
On 2013-07-24 12:12, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 11:22 AM, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote:
>> I'll go investigating, and if I can't find a fix I'll modify the code to
>> handle the unexpanded variable value gracefully...
>
> Actually, now that I look at the POMs in more detail, where do you set
> the "org.apache.jackrabbit.jcr2dav.RepositoryStubImpl.port" property
> in the first place. The system property declaration is:
>
>      <property>
>        <name>org.apache.jackrabbit.jcr2dav.RepositoryStubImpl.port</name>
>        <value>${org.apache.jackrabbit.jcr2dav.RepositoryStubImpl.port}</value>
>      </property>
>
> But the value of that property is nowhere specified. If it isn't given
> on the command line as
> -Dorg.apache.jackrabbit.jcr2dav.RepositoryStubImpl.port=NNN then in
> the test cases the system property will show up as
> "${org.apache.jackrabbit.jcr2dav.RepositoryStubImpl.port}", which is
> what the test output is showing.

My assumption was that it would be populated from the system property, 
which apparently is the case on my machine (Maven version?). In 
particular, I wanted to avoid having to specify the default in multiple 
places.

> In revision 1506479 I added a default value of 0 for that property.

Yes, that has fixed it. Thanks!



Mime
View raw message