Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-jackrabbit-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 65F55F227 for ; Thu, 21 Mar 2013 14:25:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 2875 invoked by uid 500); 21 Mar 2013 14:25:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-dev-archive@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 2834 invoked by uid 500); 21 Mar 2013 14:25:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@jackrabbit.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 2826 invoked by uid 99); 21 Mar 2013 14:25:15 -0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (HELO arcas.apache.org) (140.211.11.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 21 Mar 2013 14:25:15 +0000 Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 14:25:15 +0000 (UTC) From: "Thomas Mueller (JIRA)" To: dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Commented] (JCR-3534) Add JackrabbitSession.getValueByContentId method MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3534?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13608971#comment-13608971 ] Thomas Mueller commented on JCR-3534: ------------------------------------- Sounds good. In addition, I think we should consider having a mechanism to expire the identifier, similar to Amazon S3. I found some information here: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/14414455/amazon-s3-generating-an-expiring-link-using-ruby-1-9-3 What do you think about the limited lifetime of an identifier? I think it might be overkill, but I'm not sure. > Add JackrabbitSession.getValueByContentId method > ------------------------------------------------ > > Key: JCR-3534 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3534 > Project: Jackrabbit Content Repository > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: jackrabbit-api, jackrabbit-core > Affects Versions: 2.6 > Reporter: Felix Meschberger > Attachments: JCR-3534.patch > > > we have a couple of use cases, where we would like to leverage the global data store to prevent sending around and copying around large binary data unnecessarily: We have two separate Jackrabbit instances configured to use the same DataStore (for the sake of this discussion assume we have the problems of concurrent access and garbage collection under control). When sending content from one instance to the other instance we don't want to send potentially large binary data (e.g. video files) if not needed. > The idea is for the sender to just send the content identity from JackrabbitValue.getContentIdentity(). The receiver would then check whether the such content already exists and would reuse if so: > String ci = contentIdentity_from_sender; > try { > Value v = session.getValueByContentIdentity(ci); > Property p = targetNode.setProperty(propName, v); > } catch (ItemNotFoundException ie) { > // unknown or invalid content Identity > } catch (RepositoryException re) { > // some other exception > } > Thus the proposed JackrabbitSession.getValueByContentIdentity(String) method would allow for round tripping the JackrabbitValue.getContentIdentity() preventing superfluous binary data copying and moving. > See also the dev@ thread http://jackrabbit.markmail.org/thread/gedk5jsrp6offkhi -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira