Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-jackrabbit-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C1E83D3EF for ; Thu, 29 Nov 2012 10:08:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 71667 invoked by uid 500); 29 Nov 2012 10:08:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-dev-archive@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 71372 invoked by uid 500); 29 Nov 2012 10:08:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@jackrabbit.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 71340 invoked by uid 99); 29 Nov 2012 10:08:33 -0000 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 29 Nov 2012 10:08:33 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO mail-ob0-f170.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username bdelacretaz, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 29 Nov 2012 10:08:32 +0000 Received: by mail-ob0-f170.google.com with SMTP id wp18so27397525obc.1 for ; Thu, 29 Nov 2012 02:08:32 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.174.39 with SMTP id bp7mr7426098obc.1.1354183711990; Thu, 29 Nov 2012 02:08:31 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.76.23.201 with HTTP; Thu, 29 Nov 2012 02:08:31 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <7282C511-F42F-4713-9D8B-D33DC331B514@magnolia-cms.com> References: <3095D151-8433-46B4-A3B7-E8A602FC99C0@magnolia-cms.com> <7282C511-F42F-4713-9D8B-D33DC331B514@magnolia-cms.com> Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 11:08:31 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: issues fixed by nobody? From: Bertrand Delacretaz To: dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 10:44 AM, Jan Haderka wrote: > ...What does it mean if the issue is unassigned by the time when it was > closed?... IMO it usually just means that whoever fixed the issue forgot to assign it to themselves. The PMC as a whole takes responsibility for issues anyway, someone fixing an issue does not imply that they will be in charge of that issue or component for ever, so "assigned to" is only really useful when an issue is open, for someone to indicate that they're working on it. -Bertrand