Mailing-List: contact dev-help@jackrabbit.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@jackrabbit.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of a.schrijvers@1hippo.com
 designates 64.18.2.18 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <5045FA7A.6010602@apache.org>
References: 
 <CABXgNGmE72LEUGdCyJjBs1P6k9v7wGdu=neSez80xvqZNDbwHg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CABXgNG=HYLZbNrE3bjgBciwyHP5LTgv+aGFrFBGLCaEy4uixsw@mail.gmail.com>
	<5045FA7A.6010602@apache.org>
Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2012 15:09:44 +0200
Message-ID: 
 <CABXgNGmUA3JLU4bNCqzbU=vVYzAbWxrgnE4rn_6rCi60uV4+4A@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit OCM 2.0.0
From: Ard Schrijvers <a.schrijvers@onehippo.com>
To: dev@jackrabbit.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hello Michael,

On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 2:56 PM, Michael D=FCrig <mduerig@apache.org> wrote:
>
>
> On 10.7.12 16:39, Ard Schrijvers wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 5:39 PM, Ard Schrijvers
>> <a.schrijvers@onehippo.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Jackrabbit OCM 2.0.0
>>
>>
>> The vote passes as follows:
>>
>>      +1 Ard Schrijvers
>>      +1 Unico Hommes
>>      +1 Michael D=FCrig
>>      +1 Bart van der Schans
>>      +1 Jukka Zitting
>>
>> Thanks for voting, thanks for the feedback regarding the release (see
>> [1] and [2] for next iteration improvements), and I'll push out the
>> release
>
>
> Hi,
>
> What is the state of this? I can see from
> http://archive.apache.org/dist/jackrabbit/ocm/2.0.0/ that the release is
> there but never saw an announcement on the list not can I see it listed o=
n
> the Jackrabbit web site. Can we consider OCM 2.0.0 released? Otherwise wh=
at
> are the missing bits to make it happen?

This is completely my bad, apologies! I can't really recall but it
must have slipped my mind to actually announce the 2.0.0 release. I'll
send out an announcement today to the public list, ok?

Regarding the website : Should I only include the info at [1] or also
at [2]. I am not sure whether the release notes from ocm belong at
[2]. Do you have a suggestion?

Regards Ard

[1] http://jackrabbit.apache.org/object-content-mapping.html
[2] http://jackrabbit.apache.org/downloads.html
>
> Michael
>
>
>>
>> Regards Ard
>>
>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OCM-62 : Improve pom to
>> align releases with the Jackrabbit assembly plugin configuration
>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OCM-63 : Make sure derby.log
>> ends up in target dir
>>
>


--=20
Amsterdam - Oosteinde 11, 1017 WT Amsterdam
Boston - 1 Broadway, Cambridge, MA 02142

US +1 877 414 4776 (toll free)
Europe +31(0)20 522 4466
www.onehippo.com