jackrabbit-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Marcel Reutegger <mreut...@adobe.com>
Subject RE: HDFS with Jackrabbit
Date Thu, 30 Aug 2012 07:31:19 GMT

I did some work in that area in the past. you can find it in the
jackrabbit sandbox:

I'd say the most useful is the DataStore implementation based on
HDFS. The other implementations (Jackrabbit FileSystem and SPI
implementation on HDFS) are rather proof of concepts.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: foreverdeepak [mailto:foreverdeepak@gmail.com]
> Sent: Donnerstag, 30. August 2012 07:40
> To: dev@jackrabbit.apache.org
> Subject: HDFS with Jackrabbit
> Hi,
> I went through the Jackrabbit documentation and it suggest that using
> Jackrabbit with Local File System is faster than relational database. But a
> relational database provides me the capability of data replication that I
> will loose in local file system.
> So, we are planning to use HDFS (without map-reduce) as a JCR Filesystem. I
> also went through the
> http://jackrabbit.510166.n4.nabble.com/using-Hadoop-HDFS-as-a-storage-
> in-JR-td515716.html
> this  post, but couldn't get any conclusion.
> Please suggest is it better idea to use HDFS for JCR data replication.
> --
> View this message in context: http://jackrabbit.510166.n4.nabble.com/HDFS-
> with-Jackrabbit-tp4656384.html
> Sent from the Jackrabbit - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

View raw message