Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-jackrabbit-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 26491C4F8 for ; Tue, 3 Jul 2012 09:44:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 15917 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jul 2012 09:44:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-dev-archive@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 15633 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jul 2012 09:44:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@jackrabbit.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 15590 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jul 2012 09:44:38 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 Jul 2012 09:44:38 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of a.schrijvers@1hippo.com designates 64.18.2.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.18.2.155] (HELO exprod7og101.obsmtp.com) (64.18.2.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Tue, 03 Jul 2012 09:44:32 +0000 Received: from mail-vc0-f181.google.com ([209.85.220.181]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob101.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKT/K+68jH9/IZbbriQE4bFueXXHWIjs7q@postini.com; Tue, 03 Jul 2012 02:44:12 PDT Received: by vcbf1 with SMTP id f1so4548199vcb.40 for ; Tue, 03 Jul 2012 02:44:11 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=jh971eJhTtiS7HUjRTmygu1MwSTRa4mXB5MhCoMBHhY=; b=NIPAbbbG7ff9H1DkLWwoOXDWSnTTfZj6b89LESp0Hcc+mwCIFaQ5L5sLhdQw70Vv32 5QQytQMVvInXfHCbuiImfiXOcU1TibdkNkSOz2f5MD3VY/cO5RKuyhtPX3LKBLT3WqjT Hs4KXLOsCFB6HkE2uzGs9xIcpptIgM8B6lcKi/+F12eITN/ZdI7l/PLsDZMUGbfK+zcw wPbXgukzDbCbPG0vG+JMdJpm/OaRTyOFfBIIrYFW1DcZ/WQEqjCs/miOisv8OEQ6s2Cz 3Z5C2epciiMuzUNcZRJ7nYsfwoICZzbmQkJIkZNW6kIAM7ej3ymUuIzqyC4MMRg3B21E SleQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.97.41 with SMTP id dx9mr6378050vdb.89.1341308651125; Tue, 03 Jul 2012 02:44:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.168.133 with HTTP; Tue, 3 Jul 2012 02:44:11 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2012 11:44:11 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Question about same name siblings and authorization From: Ard Schrijvers To: dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlJcQvTfRxqFDEkITg717IyDhEWg5ALdCKzEwARYTTmJG2eXElW7rOpyi/Wg3rJF28bIFVJ X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 11:39 AM, Stefan Guggisberg wrote: >> >> Ah, thanks Jukka and Stefan for the quick replies. >> >> So the "compacts indices" mode for SNS is also allowed (as stated in >> paragraph $22.5), but I suspect that may take quite some effort to >> implement this in the current code base. And even then it probably >> will come at the cost of some performance. > > i would guess that implementing session-local index compacting would > result in pretty nasty code. apart from that i don't see any benefit in > doing so as the current behavior is clearly spec-compliant. I agree that indeed nothing in Jackrabbit should be changed, as it is clearly according spec. We just have to find out a way to deal with the legacy we have on this area Ard > > cheers > stefan > >> >> Regards, >> Bart -- Amsterdam - Oosteinde 11, 1017 WT Amsterdam Boston - 1 Broadway, Cambridge, MA 02142 US +1 877 414 4776 (toll free) Europe +31(0)20 522 4466 www.onehippo.com