jackrabbit-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jukka Zitting <jukka.zitt...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: expanded names vs node types
Date Sat, 26 May 2012 23:55:37 GMT
Hi,

On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 3:08 PM, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote:
> I just realized that in JCR 2.0, we may have forgotten to specify whether
> node type related methods (addMixin, isNodeType etc) are supposed to take
> expanded names.
>
> I believe they should, but I can't find anything related to it in the
> JavaDocs. Should we raise this as a JSR-333 issue?

JCR 2.0 is already pretty clear on this. Section 3.2.6 [1] says: "When
a JCR name is passed as an argument to a JCR method it may be in
either expanded or qualified form."

[1] http://www.day.com/specs/jcr/2.0/3_Repository_Model.html#3.2.6%20Use%20of%20Qualified%20and%20Expanded%20Names

BR,

Jukka Zitting

Mime
View raw message