jackrabbit-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ard Schrijvers <a.schrijv...@onehippo.com>
Subject Re: Moving OCM issues to backlog version
Date Fri, 25 May 2012 15:45:53 GMT
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 5:31 PM, Jukka Zitting <jukka.zitting@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 2:18 PM, Ard Schrijvers
> <a.schrijvers@onehippo.com> wrote:
>> Let's see what others prefer
>
> I generally find that sorting open issues by the last update is enough
> to filter out old and inactive issues. The other alternatives are
> either quickly outdated (who'll take care of updating the list of
> "backlog" issues over time?) or incorrect (inactivity does not
> necessarily mean an issue is resolved or no longer relevant). The best
> way to deal with old issues is for someone to actually spend a few
> minutes per issue to review what's the current status and update or
> resolve the issue accordingly. Until someone has the time and energy
> for that I'd rather just leave the issues untouched.
>
> Anyway, given that you're the first one to seriously use the OCM
> tracker for a while, I'd say whatever works for you is best. :-)

I'll go through all open issues, close them if needed, and if still
relevant, leave them as is

Regards Ard

>
> BR,
>
> Jukka Zitting



-- 
Amsterdam - Oosteinde 11, 1017 WT Amsterdam
Boston - 1 Broadway, Cambridge, MA 02142

US +1 877 414 4776 (toll free)
Europe +31(0)20 522 4466
www.onehippo.com

Mime
View raw message