Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-jackrabbit-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 56F239A4A for ; Thu, 1 Mar 2012 10:43:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 53756 invoked by uid 500); 1 Mar 2012 10:43:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-dev-archive@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 53703 invoked by uid 500); 1 Mar 2012 10:43:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@jackrabbit.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 53696 invoked by uid 99); 1 Mar 2012 10:43:39 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Mar 2012 10:43:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=FRT_ADOBE2,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of mueller@adobe.com designates 64.18.1.23 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.18.1.23] (HELO exprod6og109.obsmtp.com) (64.18.1.23) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Mar 2012 10:43:30 +0000 Received: from outbound-smtp-2.corp.adobe.com ([193.104.215.16]) by exprod6ob109.postini.com ([64.18.5.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKT09SvXfKxpnj3VlNogEKibgrVclVVFfb@postini.com; Thu, 01 Mar 2012 02:43:09 PST Received: from inner-relay-1.corp.adobe.com (inner-relay-1.sea.adobe.com [153.32.1.51]) by outbound-smtp-2.corp.adobe.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id q21Ah7N3015540 for ; Thu, 1 Mar 2012 02:43:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from nacas03.corp.adobe.com (nacas03.corp.adobe.com [10.8.189.121]) by inner-relay-1.corp.adobe.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id q21Ah6MM021470 for ; Thu, 1 Mar 2012 02:43:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from eurhub01.eur.adobe.com (10.128.4.30) by nacas03.corp.adobe.com (10.8.189.121) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.192.1; Thu, 1 Mar 2012 02:43:06 -0800 Received: from eurmbx01.eur.adobe.com ([10.128.4.32]) by eurhub01.eur.adobe.com ([10.128.4.30]) with mapi; Thu, 1 Mar 2012 10:43:05 +0000 From: Thomas Mueller To: "dev@jackrabbit.apache.org" Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2012 10:43:03 +0000 Subject: Re: [jr3] Tree model Thread-Topic: [jr3] Tree model Thread-Index: Acz3mBU3MvnVVB1kTFW1Xf40RJrAOQ== Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <54B265DC-FE51-4D4C-B388-28B1ECE48645@adobe.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.14.0.111121 acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi, On 3/1/12 11:18 AM, "Felix Meschberger" wrote: >Hi, >Am 28.02.2012 um 18:21 schrieb Jukka Zitting: >> Otherwise >> we'll just continue down the path where everyone has their own >> MicroKernel implementation. > >I don't think this is bad per se .. in fact it could be the source of >better implementations. > >It may even end up with two implementations with strength in different >areas and use cases for both ... We can try to further combine common areas. One such area is probably the node (which is what Jukkas proposal is about), specially because it is also required in the layers above. Regards, Thomas