From dev-return-34350-apmail-jackrabbit-dev-archive=jackrabbit.apache.org@jackrabbit.apache.org Thu Mar 1 08:33:01 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-jackrabbit-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EE4869B55 for ; Thu, 1 Mar 2012 08:33:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 7399 invoked by uid 500); 1 Mar 2012 08:33:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-dev-archive@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 7356 invoked by uid 500); 1 Mar 2012 08:33:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@jackrabbit.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 7336 invoked by uid 99); 1 Mar 2012 08:33:00 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Mar 2012 08:33:00 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of mueller@adobe.com designates 64.18.1.39 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.18.1.39] (HELO exprod6og117.obsmtp.com) (64.18.1.39) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Mar 2012 08:32:50 +0000 Received: from outbound-smtp-1.corp.adobe.com ([192.150.11.134]) by exprod6ob117.postini.com ([64.18.5.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKT080HWkC4tnSrE1CPR+lUWbYwA8puwKL@postini.com; Thu, 01 Mar 2012 00:32:30 PST Received: from inner-relay-1.corp.adobe.com ([153.32.1.51]) by outbound-smtp-1.corp.adobe.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id q218USJ0009486 for ; Thu, 1 Mar 2012 00:30:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from nacas02.corp.adobe.com (nacas02.corp.adobe.com [10.8.189.100]) by inner-relay-1.corp.adobe.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id q218WSMM017050 for ; Thu, 1 Mar 2012 00:32:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from eurcas01.eur.adobe.com (10.128.4.27) by nacas02.corp.adobe.com (10.8.189.100) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.192.1; Thu, 1 Mar 2012 00:32:28 -0800 Received: from eurmbx01.eur.adobe.com ([10.128.4.32]) by eurcas01.eur.adobe.com ([10.128.4.27]) with mapi; Thu, 1 Mar 2012 08:32:26 +0000 From: Thomas Mueller To: "dev@jackrabbit.apache.org" Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2012 08:32:25 +0000 Subject: Re: [jr3 trade consistency for availability] Thread-Topic: [jr3 trade consistency for availability] Thread-Index: Acz3hdT6mhbocsdtQ6unyIZDkx6Pdw== Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <9C0FC4C8E9C29945B01766FC7F9D389816E3CC91BA@eurmbx01.eur.adobe.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.14.0.111121 acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi, > I understand this would require tagging each node with a timestamp, >right? > If that's the case, then it's not just about complexity, but also additional > storage requirements. If the node id is a counter, then there is no additional storage requirement. Regards, Thomas