Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-jackrabbit-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9AD659232 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 11:11:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 21892 invoked by uid 500); 27 Feb 2012 11:11:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-dev-archive@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 21847 invoked by uid 500); 27 Feb 2012 11:11:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@jackrabbit.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 21840 invoked by uid 99); 27 Feb 2012 11:11:22 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 11:11:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=FRT_ADOBE2,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of matamel@adobe.com designates 64.18.1.21 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.18.1.21] (HELO exprod6og108.obsmtp.com) (64.18.1.21) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 11:11:12 +0000 Received: from outbound-smtp-1.corp.adobe.com ([192.150.11.134]) by exprod6ob108.postini.com ([64.18.5.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKT0tkuugZZCg8SpcOk4DBVJ0V+fewkRH0@postini.com; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 03:10:51 PST Received: from inner-relay-4.eur.adobe.com (inner-relay-4.adobe.com [193.104.215.14]) by outbound-smtp-1.corp.adobe.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id q1RB8pJ0025330 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 03:08:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from nacas01.corp.adobe.com (nacas01.corp.adobe.com [10.8.189.99]) by inner-relay-4.eur.adobe.com (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id q1RBAjPm015432 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 03:10:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from NAMBX02.corp.adobe.com ([10.8.127.96]) by nacas01.corp.adobe.com ([10.8.189.99]) with mapi; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 03:10:48 -0800 From: Mete Atamel To: "dev@jackrabbit.apache.org" Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 03:10:41 -0800 Subject: Re: [jr3] Codename Thread-Topic: [jr3] Codename Thread-Index: Acz1QHTy3F395J4QQO25UBlihuIsJg== Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.14.0.111121 acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I think Jackrabbit name is good because: 1- When you hear it, you know right away how to spell it. 2- There is not much else named Jackrabbit or similar. IMO, Jonsai/Jansai fails #1 and Oak fails #2. I don't have a good alternate name in mind though. -Mete On 2/27/12 12:01 PM, "Thomas Mueller" wrote: >Hi, > >>I'd like to have a big tree in my garden I >>wouldn't google for bonsai :) > >Why does the project name has anything to do with 'big'? A jackrabbit is >not big either; it's not even a tree! And it was a good name. > >Jonsai (or Jansai or similar) sound nice to me. > >Oak has many search results (58 million). > >Regards, >Thomas >