From dev-return-34346-apmail-jackrabbit-dev-archive=jackrabbit.apache.org@jackrabbit.apache.org Wed Feb 29 16:47:41 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-jackrabbit-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BB8179301 for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 16:47:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 7674 invoked by uid 500); 29 Feb 2012 16:47:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-dev-archive@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 7644 invoked by uid 500); 29 Feb 2012 16:47:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@jackrabbit.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 7637 invoked by uid 99); 29 Feb 2012 16:47:41 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 16:47:41 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [64.18.1.37] (HELO exprod6og116.obsmtp.com) (64.18.1.37) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 16:47:33 +0000 Received: from outbound-smtp-2.corp.adobe.com ([193.104.215.16]) by exprod6ob116.postini.com ([64.18.5.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKT05WkNEcR5qOpLrBBddkeYNVvJW85nrt@postini.com; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 08:47:13 PST Received: from inner-relay-4.eur.adobe.com (inner-relay-4b [10.128.4.237]) by outbound-smtp-2.corp.adobe.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id q1TGlBN3012918 for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 08:47:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from nacas03.corp.adobe.com (nacas03.corp.adobe.com [10.8.189.121]) by inner-relay-4.eur.adobe.com (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id q1TGlAPl028981 for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 08:47:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from eurcas01.eur.adobe.com (10.128.4.27) by nacas03.corp.adobe.com (10.8.189.121) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.192.1; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 08:47:10 -0800 Received: from susi.local (10.136.129.112) by eurcas01.eur.adobe.com (10.128.4.111) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 8.3.192.1; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 16:47:08 +0000 Message-ID: <4F4E568C.8020605@apache.org> Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 16:47:08 +0000 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Michael_D=FCrig?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Subject: Re: [jr3 trade consistency for availability] References: <4F4527A9.6060507@adobe.com> <9C0FC4C8E9C29945B01766FC7F9D389816E3A56CC4@eurmbx01.eur.adobe.com> <4F462659.4080102@apache.org> <4F4CE0D9.6020900@gmail.com> <9C0FC4C8E9C29945B01766FC7F9D389816E3CC8F39@eurmbx01.eur.adobe.com> <2C4F1A4A-13EF-4B2A-8872-5C48872AF5BA@adobe.com> <9C0FC4C8E9C29945B01766FC7F9D389816E3CC90D6@eurmbx01.eur.adobe.com> <4F4E386D.4080500@apache.org> <9C0FC4C8E9C29945B01766FC7F9D389816E3CC912E@eurmbx01.eur.adobe.com> In-Reply-To: <9C0FC4C8E9C29945B01766FC7F9D389816E3CC912E@eurmbx01.eur.adobe.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 29.2.12 15:45, Marcel Reutegger wrote: >> Vector clocks. See the presentation [1] which I prepared for the last F2F. > > I understand this would require tagging each node with a timestamp, right? > If that's the case, then it's not just about complexity, but also additional > storage requirements. Right. But since we version nodes already, we might come up with a clever way to reuse the id here. Just an idea though... Michael > > regards > marcel