jackrabbit-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Alexander Klimetschek <aklim...@adobe.com>
Subject Re: [jr3 optional features]
Date Tue, 28 Feb 2012 13:17:32 GMT
Am 23.02.2012 um 12:33 schrieb Michael Dürig:
> Having node.type.management.orderable.child.nodes.supported = false 
> might be a bit harsh. But orderable child node lists and large number of 
> child nodes are definitely in each other's way. I think we should come 
> up with a way to let users choose.

Users can already chose: using the node type parameter "orderable".

A repository-global decision to use either or does not really help, as in most cases you will
have the need for both cases (huge unordered bunch + smaller ordered list).

Cheers,
Alex

-- 
Alexander Klimetschek
Developer // Adobe (Day) // Berlin - Basel


Mime
View raw message