jackrabbit-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Julian Reschke <julian.resc...@gmx.de>
Subject Re: [jr3 optional features]
Date Thu, 23 Feb 2012 12:15:13 GMT
On 2012-02-23 10:50, Thomas Mueller wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> option.transactions.supported = true
>
>
> Is this JTA, right? Is it really required?
>
>> shareable nodes
>> it shouldn't be hard to implement them properly when starting from
>> scratch.
>
> In my (old) prototype they caused a rather big architectural change. I
> wouldn't support them if possible.
>
>
>>> node.type.management.orderable.child.nodes.supported = false
>>
>> why? in CQ we rely on the ability to have orderable child nodes.
>
> The problem is we want to support large child node lists, and for this
> case keeping them ordered is expensive (possible, but more complex, and
> will slow down adding/removing child nodes to such nodes by factor 2-3).
>
> Currently, small child node lists (less than 2000 child nodes or so) are
> orderable, but large ones are not.
>
>> i would appreciate if XPATH was still being supported.
>
> What about if we support a (to be defined) subset of XPATH? For example by
> converting it to SQL2.

I believe you can map all of JCR-XPath to SQL2.



Mime
View raw message