Mailing-List: contact dev-help@jackrabbit.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@jackrabbit.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of stefan.guggisberg@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.214.170 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAOFYJNbtGOu-e59m8jqcDjvnSjrGOtQmvoJngeP1ZBq9so+6hw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <FDA78E7E-3328-4343-A506-F13C63A7D9E4@adobe.com>
	<CAOFYJNbtGOu-e59m8jqcDjvnSjrGOtQmvoJngeP1ZBq9so+6hw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 13:46:31 +0100
Message-ID: 
 <CAFYk8NkR_vewV0hjV0rQisqtz5hgu8UmnjTs67zyn=ibRaLHNQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [jr3 Microkernel] compiler settings in pom.xml
From: Stefan Guggisberg <stefan.guggisberg@gmail.com>
To: dev@jackrabbit.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 12:28 PM, Jukka Zitting <jukka.zitting@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 5:54 PM, Dominique Pfister <dpfister@adobe.com> wrote:
>> So my question is: should we change this setting from 1.5 to 1.6 (which I
>> favor) or review our code?
>
> +1 to 1.6
>
> And while we're at it, would people be interested in using a "language
> enhancement" tool like Lombok [1] to reduce the amount of commonly
> needed boilerplate code? The downside is that the such custom
> extensions increase the entry barrier for people trying to understand
> the code and might make some tool integration (debugging, etc.) a bit
> harder. Personally I think the benefits would be worth it.
>
> [1] http://projectlombok.org/

-0, i am not a big fan of *magic* code generating frameworks. i prefer to see
(and debug) plain java code in my ide.

cheers
stefan

>
> BR,
>
> Jukka Zitting