Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-jackrabbit-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A7E5A91D4 for ; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 16:29:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 30308 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jan 2012 16:29:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-dev-archive@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 30270 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jan 2012 16:29:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@jackrabbit.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 30263 invoked by uid 99); 31 Jan 2012 16:29:48 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 16:29:48 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of fmeschbe@adobe.com designates 64.18.1.183 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.18.1.183] (HELO exprod6og102.obsmtp.com) (64.18.1.183) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 16:29:40 +0000 Received: from outbound-smtp-2.corp.adobe.com ([193.104.215.16]) by exprod6ob102.postini.com ([64.18.5.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKTygW388XK2SNGiDEJJomMgdGEcPKF8X3@postini.com; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 08:29:20 PST Received: from inner-relay-4.eur.adobe.com (inner-relay-4b [10.128.4.237]) by outbound-smtp-2.corp.adobe.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id q0VGTIbR025733 for ; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 08:29:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from nahub01.corp.adobe.com (nahub01.corp.adobe.com [10.8.189.97]) by inner-relay-4.eur.adobe.com (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id q0VGTHPl008909 for ; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 08:29:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from eurcas01.eur.adobe.com (10.128.4.27) by nahub01.corp.adobe.com (10.8.189.97) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.192.1; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 08:29:17 -0800 Received: from eurmbx01.eur.adobe.com ([10.128.4.32]) by eurcas01.eur.adobe.com ([10.128.4.27]) with mapi; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 16:29:16 +0000 From: Felix Meschberger To: "dev@jackrabbit.apache.org" Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 16:29:10 +0000 Subject: Re: [jr3 Microkernel] compiler settings in pom.xml Thread-Topic: [jr3 Microkernel] compiler settings in pom.xml Thread-Index: AczgNXjhhgtomLnRSR2cVKpk0k1YLQ== Message-ID: <7A2D30F9-F6DC-4D10-BA7D-FCC4CBEEDE95@adobe.com> References: <4F27EB26.1070007@apache.org> <3BE576AB-CD8D-4D22-8CFA-2CB06D017B64@adobe.com> <4F27FF11.50808@apache.org> <4F2815F7.8040206@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <4F2815F7.8040206@apache.org> Accept-Language: de-DE, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: de-DE, en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Hi, Am 31.01.2012 um 17:25 schrieb Michael D=FCrig: >=20 >=20 > On 31.1.12 16:11, Felix Meschberger wrote: >> Hi, >>=20 >> Am 31.01.2012 um 15:47 schrieb Michael D=FCrig: >>=20 >>> OTOH, sticking with Java might leave us lagging behind, entrapped in >>> never ending concurrency night mares and memory contention issues. >>=20 >> This is probably and simply not true: It is not the language's fault tha= t developers are not adhering to fundamental concurrency tenets like for ex= ample immutable objects ... In fact it is a long-standing recommendation to= strive for immutable objects. > Which includes the whole Java collection framework: mutability around=20 > every corner ready to bite... Well, this framework is built around this --- after all a collection is her= e to be modified. But then they knew what they did and documented it ... Regards Felix=