jackrabbit-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Alexander Klimetschek <aklim...@adobe.com>
Subject Re: [jr3] Orderable child nodes: required (to be the default)?
Date Mon, 23 Jan 2012 11:25:48 GMT
On 23.01.12 11:43, "Felix Meschberger" <fmeschbe@adobe.com> wrote:
>Wouldn't it be such, that "unordered" might mean "no defined but stable
>ordering" while ordered means "insertion order unless eplicitly changed" ?

+1

Alex

-- 
Alexander Klimetschek
Developer // Adobe (Day) // Berlin - Basel





Mime
View raw message