jackrabbit-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Alexander Klimetschek <aklim...@adobe.com>
Subject Re: [jr3] Orderable child nodes: required (to be the default)?
Date Fri, 20 Jan 2012 15:52:56 GMT
On 20.01.12 16:50, "Thomas Mueller" <mueller@adobe.com> wrote:
>>Isn't the current appending the simplest and fastest?
>
>No. It requires to keep two indexes: one by number, and one by name.
>Having only one index (by name) is about twice as fast, and needs about
>half the disk space / memory.

Ah, I guess this is because both cases (orderable & non-orderable) share
the same data structure underneath. Wouldn't it make sense for J3 to
support both cases naturally in the persistence layer?

Cheers,
Alex

-- 
Alexander Klimetschek
Developer // Adobe (Day) // Berlin - Basel





Mime
View raw message