jackrabbit-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Stefan Guggisberg <stefan.guggisb...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [Jackrabbit Wiki] Update of "Jsop" by stefan
Date Wed, 14 Dec 2011 15:02:10 GMT
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 3:54 PM, Michael Dürig <mduerig@apache.org> wrote:
> On 14.12.11 14:18, Julian Reschke wrote:
>>> The use case is that the client should have a way to detect the JCR data
>>> type for unstructured data (JSON doesn't have a 'date' data type). For
>>> the
>>> MicroKernel, we currently use a different convention: we encode the data
>>> type in the value.
>> <insert-anti-JSON-pro-XML-rant-here/>
>> Maybe sometimes simple is too simple :-)
> When we started using 'JSOP' and JSON for the jr3 Microkernel based
> implementation, we didn't have a clear picture on how to map things to JCR.
> The conception then was 'decorate it on top somehow'. As it is apparent from
> this discussion, this isn't as easy as it seems without resorting to ad-hoc
> extensions.

WRT 'copy': not simple? ad-hoc extension? to what? a non-existing specification?


> This discussion just touched two of the paint points: copy and data types.
> Others are: observation, locking, name spaces and remapping, access control,
> ordering, properties and nodes with the same name, same name siblings...
> Michael

View raw message