jackrabbit-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Michael Dürig (Commented) (JIRA) <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (JCR-2906) Multivalued property sorted by last/random value
Date Thu, 24 Nov 2011 14:26:39 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-2906?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13156724#comment-13156724

Michael Dürig commented on JCR-2906:

>From looking at the code this makes sense and seems ok. However I get a test failure when
I run this for UserManagerSearchTest#testSoertOrder1. AFAICS this is due to a bad interaction
with the new array comperator and the uppercase respectively lowercase comperators. 
However I also observe, that I get comperator arrays of different lengths for the same property
of different nodes. In the test case mentioned I get for some nodes [null, null, null, null,
WHITE] and for others [null, null, null, WHITE].
> Multivalued property sorted by last/random value
> ------------------------------------------------
>                 Key: JCR-2906
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-2906
>             Project: Jackrabbit Content Repository
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: indexing
>    Affects Versions: 2.2
>         Environment: Windows 7, Sun JDK 1.6.0_23
>            Reporter: Paul Lysak
>              Labels: multivalued, sort
>         Attachments: JCR-2906-v2.patch, JCR-2906.patch
> Sorting on multivalued property may produce incorrect result because sorting is performed
only by last value of multivalued property.
> Steps to reproduce:
> 1. Create multivalued field in repository. Example from nodetypes file:
> <propertyDefinition name="MyProperty" requiredType="String" autoCreated="false" mandatory="false"
>    onParentVersion="COPY" protected="false" multiple="false">
> 2. Create few records so that all records except one would contain single value for MyProperty
and one record would contain 
> first value which is greater then of any other record and the second value is somewhere
in the middle. Here is an example:
> 1st record: "aaaa"
> 2nd record: "cccc"
> 3rd record: "dddd", "bbbb"
> 3. Run some query which sorts Example of XPath query:
> //*[...here are some criteria...] order by @MyProperty ascending
> The query would return documents in such order:
> "aaaa"
> "dddd", "bbbb"
> "cccc"
> which is not expected order (expected same order as they were entered - as "aaaa" <
"cccc", "cccc" < "dddd")
> After some digging I found out that it happens because method 
> org.apache.jackrabbit.core.query.lucene.SharedFieldCache.getValueIndex
> (called from org.apache.jackrabbit.core.query.lucene.SharedFieldSortComparator.SimpleScoreDocComparator
> returns only last Comparable of the document. Here is overwrites previous value:
> retArray[termDocs.doc()] = getValue(value, type);
> I tried to concatenate comparables (just to check if it would work for my case):
> 	if(retArray[termDocs.doc()] == null) {
> 		retArray[termDocs.doc()] = getValue(value, type);
> 	} else {
> 		retArray[termDocs.doc()] =
> 				retArray[termDocs.doc()] + " " + getValue(value, type);
> 	}
> But it didn't worked well either - TermEnum returns terms not in the same order as JackRabbit
returns values of multivalued field
> (as an example ["qwer", "asdf"] may become ["asdf", "qwer"] ). So, simple concatenation
doesn't help.

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira


View raw message