Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-jackrabbit-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 530AE49DA for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 09:46:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 53554 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jun 2011 09:46:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-dev-archive@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 53472 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jun 2011 09:46:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@jackrabbit.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 53464 invoked by uid 99); 21 Jun 2011 09:46:09 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 09:46:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of mueller@adobe.com designates 64.18.1.208 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.18.1.208] (HELO exprod6og107.obsmtp.com) (64.18.1.208) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 09:46:01 +0000 Received: from outbound-smtp-2.corp.adobe.com ([193.104.215.16]) by exprod6ob107.postini.com ([64.18.5.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKTgBoRE27XoXe3Xo9zgrQXy+HVgdW3WK7@postini.com; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 02:45:41 PDT Received: from inner-relay-4.eur.adobe.com (inner-relay-4b [10.128.4.237]) by outbound-smtp-2.corp.adobe.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id p5L9jdSC000146 for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 02:45:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nahub01.corp.adobe.com (nahub01.corp.adobe.com [10.8.189.97]) by inner-relay-4.eur.adobe.com (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id p5L9jajA022707 for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 02:45:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from eurhub01.eur.adobe.com (10.128.4.30) by nahub01.corp.adobe.com (10.8.189.97) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.159.3; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 02:45:36 -0700 Received: from eurmbx01.eur.adobe.com ([10.128.4.32]) by eurhub01.eur.adobe.com ([10.128.4.30]) with mapi; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 10:45:26 +0100 From: Thomas Mueller To: "dev@jackrabbit.apache.org" Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 10:45:22 +0100 Subject: Re: [j3] Repository MicroKernel API draft Thread-Topic: [j3] Repository MicroKernel API draft Thread-Index: Acwv9/IR5S2eiGz2S0uNk6P1+hiIJQ== Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.10.0.110310 acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Hi, >Sounds like a theoretical discussion doesn't help here, only >performance/resource usage comparisons can prove those differences. Yes, that's why we need to build the prototype :-) Which we can then compare against other implementations (my J3 prototype, Jackrabbit). Otherwise the discussion is essentially hot air against hot air. Regards, Thomas