Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 40778 invoked from network); 9 Nov 2010 21:12:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 9 Nov 2010 21:12:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 52706 invoked by uid 500); 9 Nov 2010 21:13:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-dev-archive@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 52617 invoked by uid 500); 9 Nov 2010 21:13:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@jackrabbit.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 52606 invoked by uid 99); 9 Nov 2010 21:13:19 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 09 Nov 2010 21:13:19 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.0 required=10.0 tests=FORGED_YAHOO_RCVD,FREEMAIL_FROM,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_NEUTRAL,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL,URI_HEX X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.139.236.158] (HELO kuber.nabble.com) (216.139.236.158) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 09 Nov 2010 21:13:14 +0000 Received: from joe.nabble.com ([192.168.236.151]) by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1PFvUr-0006jH-IJ for dev@jackrabbit.apache.org; Tue, 09 Nov 2010 13:12:53 -0800 Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2010 13:12:53 -0800 (PST) From: "kazim_ssuet@yahoo.com" To: dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Message-ID: <1289337173561-3035132.post@n4.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: <1289331575605-3034980.post@n4.nabble.com> References: <1289331575605-3034980.post@n4.nabble.com> Subject: Re: Jackrabbit performance in multi threaded environment MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Correction: threads started moving not because read only thread now login as anonynous, but because I've put session.save() in synchronized block, which is synchronized among all threads...Don't know why i had to do that. I would suppose this synchronization should be implicit. -- View this message in context: http://jackrabbit.510166.n4.nabble.com/Jackrabbit-performance-in-multi-threaded-environment-tp3034980p3035132.html Sent from the Jackrabbit - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.