jackrabbit-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Marcel Reutegger (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (JCR-2753) Deadlock in DefaultISMLocking
Date Tue, 21 Sep 2010 13:59:35 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-2753?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12912985#action_12912985

Marcel Reutegger commented on JCR-2753:

Can you please move the test to AbstractISMLockingTest in package o.a.j.core.state? the package
o.a.j.core.lock is rather related to the JCR locking fuctionality and not internal jackrabbit

> Deadlock in DefaultISMLocking
> -----------------------------
>                 Key: JCR-2753
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-2753
>             Project: Jackrabbit Content Repository
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: jackrabbit-core
>            Reporter: Thomas Mueller
>            Assignee: Thomas Mueller
>             Fix For: 2.2.0
> There seems to be a bug in DefaultISMLocking which was detected as part of JCR-2746.
> 1) The main thread gets a read lock.
> 2) The ObservationManager thread tries to lock for writing, which is blocked because
there is still a read lock.
> 3) Then the main thread tries to get a second read lock, which is blocked because there
is a waiting write lock.
> The bug was introduced as part of JCR-2089 (Use java.util.concurrent), revisions 995411
and 995412. I think the safe solution is to revert those to commits, and add a test case.
If the DefaultISMLocking is changed later on, more test cases are required. An efficient solution
is relatively complicated.

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

View raw message