Mailing-List: contact dev-help@jackrabbit.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@jackrabbit.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jukka.zitting@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.213.42 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
         :content-type;
        b=SiCyb2JzlFLADbZ10tAs83p/Ig670gUp0kYxHKYuHYsV8viFtk6CSgfs1Gz9ZRZkuF
         xTrsfi1QHIvbYiN1rpo//I1W/Zf9f7bpTaKyjZAIEH7BaNwAuRzLN6bpIoORWzDW+VCK
         CWYEy9pws+Xvj1EYBxPgK9P3iCampX6GsaGZM=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTin+mOAEhPaVfrc9EU36QqHi17xAkO7UNSbquQrX@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTinfc_kU+phRHqUmATCrxC-ETyt33Ept3yb5cApc@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTi=khBe91CM0FabJm5yfwt-=0W3vEDEy4LSaexs7@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTimJZW4yhdo+_yNk9u6WWHq5rgnVK-vcg7-s9bEe@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTin+mOAEhPaVfrc9EU36QqHi17xAkO7UNSbquQrX@mail.gmail.com>
From: Jukka Zitting <jukka.zitting@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2010 18:39:00 +0200
Message-ID: <AANLkTime2g=2-tzDMA_Rzdo94A1i+zi1X_k1KnXQHjo5@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Jackrabbit performance data
To: dev@jackrabbit.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Hi,

On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 5:36 PM, Ard Schrijvers
<a.schrijvers@onehippo.com> wrote:
> The thing is that I am particularly interested in doing searches
> against, say 100K+ nodes.

The basic test setup I'm now using for the concurrency and simple
search tests consists of a simple hierarchy of 10k small nodes.
Extending to 100k or even 1M nodes for tests that need that shouldn't
be too much trouble.

> Obviously, the unit tests search index is an in memory one, which
> might also influence the real numbers.

The current performance test suite uses the default Jackrabbit
configuration for each version, so the search indexes are actually
backed on disk. It's also possible to add alternative repository
configurations to the test suite.

BR,

Jukka Zitting