jackrabbit-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Tobias Bocanegra (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (JCR-2692) Split jcr-commons in two
Date Tue, 03 Aug 2010 19:56:17 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-2692?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12895009#action_12895009
] 

Tobias Bocanegra commented on JCR-2692:
---------------------------------------

can you please provide details there what class would move?

can't we move all the "core-support" stuff to spi-commons?

otherwise: i support jukka's idea to use a released version of jackrabbit-core for testing,

> Split jcr-commons in two 
> -------------------------
>
>                 Key: JCR-2692
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-2692
>             Project: Jackrabbit Content Repository
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: jackrabbit-jcr-commons
>    Affects Versions: 2.2.0
>            Reporter: Michael Dürig
>
> As discussed in JCR-2688, the jcr commons module should be split:
>   * jcr-impl-commons - utility classes/interfaces for help *implementing* JCR
>   * jcr-api-commons - utility classes/interfaces for help *using* JCR
> The rational is that it contains utility classes for jackrabbit-core on one hand and
utility classes for JCR API consumers on the other hand. Currently there is no clean way to
add unit tests for JCR API utility classes since this would introduce a circular dependency
on jackrabbit-core. Such unit tests currently live in the jackrabbit-core module in the o.a.j.core.integration
package. Along with the split these tests should be considered to be moved to the jcr-api-commons
module. 

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


Mime
View raw message