jackrabbit-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Norman Maurer (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (JCR-2696) Allow to use an other queue type then FIFO for requests
Date Wed, 04 Aug 2010 07:28:17 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-2696?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12895169#action_12895169
] 

Norman Maurer commented on JCR-2696:
------------------------------------

Yeah I'm aware of the FineGrainedISMLocking but as far as I know (from what Jukka said) does
it perform not very well on the not obsolate persistencemanagers

> Allow to use an other queue type then FIFO for requests
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: JCR-2696
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-2696
>             Project: Jackrabbit Content Repository
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Norman Maurer
>
> Sometimes it would be nice to be able to give reads a higher priority then writes ( because
writes block the whole jcr tree). Thats not possible atm, all requests are handled in FIFO-fashion.
I think it would make sense to allow to use other strategies.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


Mime
View raw message