[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-2692?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12894848#action_12894848
]
Felix Meschberger commented on JCR-2692:
----------------------------------------
+1 to splitting
+1 to moving the tests out of jackrabbit-core (of course ;-) )
I would suggest to rethink the naming, though. How about
jcr-util for the developper/user oriented part
jcr-core-support for the part used by jackrabbit-core (and presumably others implementing
JCR API)
> Split jcr-commons in two
> -------------------------
>
> Key: JCR-2692
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-2692
> Project: Jackrabbit Content Repository
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: jackrabbit-jcr-commons
> Affects Versions: 2.2.0
> Reporter: Michael Dürig
>
> As discussed in JCR-2688, the jcr commons module should be split:
> * jcr-impl-commons - utility classes/interfaces for help *implementing* JCR
> * jcr-api-commons - utility classes/interfaces for help *using* JCR
> The rational is that it contains utility classes for jackrabbit-core on one hand and
utility classes for JCR API consumers on the other hand. Currently there is no clean way to
add unit tests for JCR API utility classes since this would introduce a circular dependency
on jackrabbit-core. Such unit tests currently live in the jackrabbit-core module in the o.a.j.core.integration
package. Along with the split these tests should be considered to be moved to the jcr-api-commons
module.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
|