jackrabbit-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Felix Meschberger <fmesc...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [jr3] Jackrabbit 3 in trunk
Date Fri, 14 May 2010 16:43:16 GMT

As much as I understand that we should push JR 3 forward, I agree with
Angela's position.

I don't think that adding JR3 as a techno preview in upcoming JR 2 will
do any good -- except making the release process and understanding the
code even more complex.


On 14.05.2010 08:25, Angela Schreiber wrote:
> hi jukka
>> Thomas has done some nice work with the jackrabbit-j3 prototype in the
>> sandbox. To make this codebase easily available to other developers
>> and to allow better reuse of existing Jackrabbit code and integration
>> with things like jackrabbit-standalone, I propose that we move the
>> component from the sandbox to Jackrabbit trunk. This means that the
>> component would be included as a technology preview in future 2.x
>> releases and that we'd include it in our normal continuous integration
>> builds. The downside is the increased build time in trunk.
> not sure... i have the impression that it is too early to move
> the prototype out of the sandbox.
> and i don't fully understand your arguments for the move: reuse
> of existing code is achieved by adding dependencies to other
> modules in either way, isn't it? and furthermore, i don't understand
> why a sandbox project wasn't easily available... my criteria for a
> move into trunk would rather be: this prototype isn't a prototype any
> more and we feel comfortable to include it into your regular release
> cycle.
> regards
> angela
>> WDYT?
>> BR,
>> Jukka Zitting

View raw message