Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 68028 invoked from network); 19 Apr 2010 10:07:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 19 Apr 2010 10:07:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 30431 invoked by uid 500); 19 Apr 2010 10:07:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-dev-archive@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 29969 invoked by uid 500); 19 Apr 2010 10:07:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@jackrabbit.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 29957 invoked by uid 99); 19 Apr 2010 10:07:40 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 10:07:40 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of tmueller@day.com designates 207.126.148.87 as permitted sender) Received: from [207.126.148.87] (HELO eu3sys201aog101.obsmtp.com) (207.126.148.87) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 10:07:31 +0000 Received: from source ([209.85.218.214]) by eu3sys201aob101.postini.com ([207.126.154.11]) with SMTP ID DSNKS8wrTDookv2b8LtKpFbU1F7EgAYeG3LU@postini.com; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 10:07:10 UTC Received: by bwz6 with SMTP id 6so3907432bwz.13 for ; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 03:07:08 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.239.183.205 with HTTP; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 03:07:08 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 12:07:08 +0200 Received: by 10.239.193.80 with SMTP id h16mr404390hbi.151.1271671628553; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 03:07:08 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Subject: Re: [jr3] Node Identifiers / Corresponding Nodes From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Thomas_M=FCller?= To: dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi, I agree, we should concentrate on few backends. I think there are at least two: - database (what we have now, default) - in-memory (for testing only) Still I will check what it takes to support path based node ids. Currently I think it will only take one additional parameter in one method (StorageSession.newNodeId(..., Val relPath), but not sure. Let's see. Regards, Thomas