Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 20879 invoked from network); 23 Apr 2010 10:08:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 23 Apr 2010 10:08:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 22820 invoked by uid 500); 23 Apr 2010 10:08:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-dev-archive@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 22629 invoked by uid 500); 23 Apr 2010 10:08:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@jackrabbit.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 22621 invoked by uid 99); 23 Apr 2010 10:08:46 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 10:08:46 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of jukka.zitting@gmail.com designates 74.125.78.26 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.78.26] (HELO ey-out-2122.google.com) (74.125.78.26) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 10:08:39 +0000 Received: by ey-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 9so671419eyd.1 for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 03:08:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :from:date:received:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=MiaK2jzTcFdgue/rmuXnTRD8doRlkIgMgPtmuYiELRs=; b=hskHsQWIbnDIYU8O5hoCSENL5JoJGKRPJ1SB0pSOBvXrx43MC/nWeHqHTaLCaoII9L nZXSsSMt3wayrucCgndoJY/NuqKmvLv4MEMOZ74iSACbf2ZLbwGud1bC/x/9Hd4fckoL ao/d5idadJIuv+YgYZowe9+QV34gQR5oBL3KY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; b=RGlBTk4OltgIBxEJUjT4eflBJKiCbXHCrWn1Cihk+Ttl1HVi1vMbyZ1QYbKTZPMQPN en1Hij6UKxxRW5fE4K6CLn11FQmQikYbjAS94ps0cT1xuYMxg/1WuXldMJjQSsozRpxY 2lFQd5xDqrK1OZ/CVfGdZGM1ncSlWQENSD3zs= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.103.167.1 with HTTP; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 03:07:58 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Jukka Zitting Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 12:07:58 +0200 Received: by 10.103.87.36 with SMTP id p36mr3190882mul.102.1272017298142; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 03:08:18 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Subject: Re: Node.removeShareSet(), no remote implementation in 2.0.0 To: dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi, On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 5:08 PM, J F wrote: > Any hints on when the remote interface for Node.removeShareSet() and > Node.getSharedSet() will be implemented? As soon as someone submits a patch. :-) AFAIK nobody is actively working on this. BR, Jukka Zitting