jackrabbit-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Stefan Guggisberg <stefan.guggisb...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [jr3] Node Identifiers / Corresponding Nodes
Date Mon, 19 Apr 2010 11:42:20 GMT
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 11:53 AM, Jukka Zitting <jukka.zitting@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 11:44 AM, Thomas Müller <thomas.mueller@day.com> wrote:
>> I'm wondering if the Jackrabbit 3 should support storage backends that
>> use the path as the identifier. It's probably possible (with some
>> limitations), but I'm not sure if it's necessary. I'm sure it's
>> inefficient, but sometimes that's not a problem.
>>
>> What do others think? If we want to support it, we should decide that early on.
>
> I'd rather avoid too much backend flexibility. Let's keep the design
> simple and focused to the key things we want to achieve. Ideally we'd
> have just a single storage backend to avoid configuration and
> deployment complexity.

+1 :)

cheers
stefan

>
> BR,
>
> Jukka Zitting
>

Mime
View raw message