jackrabbit-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Alexander Klimetschek (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (JCR-2619) improved internal representation of DATE values
Date Tue, 27 Apr 2010 13:46:34 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-2619?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12861397#action_12861397

Alexander Klimetschek commented on JCR-2619:

> If we only want to support possible values according to the JCR 2.0 specification (this
I'm not sure)

That's what I actually meant.

Most notably, JCR 1.0 and 2.0 specifies the date based on the iso8601 string representation
without the timezone ID, only with the current offset. Hence including the timezone ID and
thus potentially changing the date upon access because of the re-interpretation of the rules
and thus a different offset, could break existing applications that currently must work around
this issue by storing the timezone ID separately.

(It would be nice to have the timezone ID included, of course, but the spec unfortunately
did not get this 100% right.)

> for example in the format yyyymmddhhMMssMMMZZZZ

Might work. ZZZZ would probably be shifted into the positive region, eg. by adding -900 if
we say -900 is the smallest negative timezone offset in minutes.

> improved internal representation of DATE values
> -----------------------------------------------
>                 Key: JCR-2619
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-2619
>             Project: Jackrabbit Content Repository
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: jackrabbit-core, jackrabbit-spi-commons
>            Reporter: Stefan Guggisberg
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 2.2.0
>         Attachments: JCR-2619_improved_internal_representation_of_DATE_values.patch
> DATE values are currently internally represented as java.util.Calendar objects.
> Calendar objects have a huge memory footprint (approx 200bytes per instance) 
> and are mutable.
> i suggest to replace the internal DATE representation with a ISO8601 format string
> (immutable and approx. 85-90% smaller footprint).

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

View raw message