hi ivo
> Getting back to your suggestion, is the "super" session able to see
> itemstate for item, which is not yet persisted and is actually "owned" by
> the session subject of authorization?
no... that's why i said that "you need to operate on the itemstate
level instead, if you want to retrieve characteristics of transient
items ...". what i meant was: new items or transient modifications.
> Having the state, can the session obtain the item itself and read its
> properties?
obtaining the "itemstate" instead of the items. take a
look at the jackrabbit internals... there is no way to
circumvent that, if you want to write a custom access
manager which is part of that interal structure.
regards
angela
|