jackrabbit-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Angela Schreiber <anch...@day.com>
Subject Re: AccessManager in Jackrabbit v1.5
Date Tue, 13 Apr 2010 11:58:56 GMT
hi ivo

> Getting back to your suggestion, is the "super" session able to see
> itemstate for item, which is not yet persisted and is actually "owned" by
> the session subject of authorization?

no... that's why i said that "you need to operate on the itemstate
level instead, if you want to retrieve characteristics of transient 
items ...". what i meant was: new items or transient modifications.

> Having the state, can the session obtain the item itself and read its
> properties?

obtaining the "itemstate" instead of the items. take a
look at the jackrabbit internals... there is no way to
circumvent that, if you want to write a custom access
manager which is part of that interal structure.

regards
angela


Mime
View raw message