Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 81170 invoked from network); 16 Mar 2010 20:52:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 16 Mar 2010 20:52:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 74127 invoked by uid 500); 16 Mar 2010 20:52:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-dev-archive@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 74026 invoked by uid 500); 16 Mar 2010 20:52:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@jackrabbit.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 73986 invoked by uid 99); 16 Mar 2010 20:52:50 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 16 Mar 2010 20:52:50 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of mrduguo@gmail.com designates 209.85.218.210 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.218.210] (HELO mail-bw0-f210.google.com) (209.85.218.210) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 16 Mar 2010 20:52:44 +0000 Received: by bwz2 with SMTP id 2so386143bwz.10 for ; Tue, 16 Mar 2010 13:52:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=UQEOynmmeya1BRSZGEhN1gOYPwOUeohi4z53MAe8Zgw=; b=qBlRLo9MYin83qdiuq/EUSA8YaWAtokBhd4Ymfm+DRPvJ9HL5Z6p77ZPLqfQUCR/ku qU5UfT4qTMfNbMvONIqmT5lBK6KUTHWtybzp83eRmVykS3XSwhrSkLcIQdIEdAFaEX3U +Lu7DnW7HoxNkDqeWwBhQ+x8m/92c44CQ+GhI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=nGP8+coqOsOn90cqhVtvt3hZ5htpuj1pUkT8uRVuBX1U58JKTtqr5pQv+AJ/SU39oN quj8SzJ+JpmVb9Ch4LLU5OsFPY5IbOhxh+mZzfaWF5VHJspsmqBLL6Fy/2BLSSEoVhb8 5j8mfmavvE0LzhP0or+RflVuqBWSrydGAS5kM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.10.140 with SMTP id p12mr84193bkp.54.1268772743801; Tue, 16 Mar 2010 13:52:23 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <91f3b2651003161146o195a4e53o872fdb0aa0aa9cd6@mail.gmail.com> References: <91f3b2651003150500k670b3734p50cadad418a6ffad@mail.gmail.com> <91f3b2651003161146o195a4e53o872fdb0aa0aa9cd6@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2010 20:52:23 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [jr3] MicroKernel prototype From: Guo Du To: dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 6:46 PM, Thomas M=FCller w= rote: > With the JDBC storage and the H2 database, this is about 14 times > faster than the Jackrabbit 2.0 trunk (0.2 seconds versus 2.9 seconds Thanks for the exciting result. In your opinion, which part make the most of performance contribution? Does prototype have similar cache size. -Guo