From dev-return-27477-apmail-jackrabbit-dev-archive=jackrabbit.apache.org@jackrabbit.apache.org Wed Mar 03 16:51:34 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 85330 invoked from network); 3 Mar 2010 16:51:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 3 Mar 2010 16:51:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 58466 invoked by uid 500); 3 Mar 2010 16:51:26 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-dev-archive@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 58442 invoked by uid 500); 3 Mar 2010 16:51:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@jackrabbit.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 58435 invoked by uid 99); 3 Mar 2010 16:51:26 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 03 Mar 2010 16:51:26 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of anchela@day.com designates 207.126.148.87 as permitted sender) Received: from [207.126.148.87] (HELO eu3sys201aog101.obsmtp.com) (207.126.148.87) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Wed, 03 Mar 2010 16:51:17 +0000 Received: from source ([209.85.220.227]) by eu3sys201aob101.postini.com ([207.126.154.11]) with SMTP ID DSNKS46TblojYPFco8wZB4ohM5dv2QqfgYux@postini.com; Wed, 03 Mar 2010 16:50:57 UTC Received: by fxm27 with SMTP id 27so1696359fxm.28 for ; Wed, 03 Mar 2010 08:50:54 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.87.58.25 with SMTP id l25mr1869981fgk.69.1267635053949; Wed, 03 Mar 2010 08:50:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from bslm-106.corp.day.com (bsl-rtr.day.com [62.192.10.254]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d8sm12732287fga.24.2010.03.03.08.50.51 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 03 Mar 2010 08:50:52 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4B8E936A.5080103@day.com> Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2010 17:50:50 +0100 From: Angela Schreiber User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Macintosh/20090302) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Subject: Re: jcr2davex tests References: <4B8E8CD8.3040907@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4B8E8CD8.3040907@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Justin Edelson wrote: > I'm working on integrating DavEx with Sling (SLING-1393) and was > wondering if there was an existing test suite that would validate that > the servlet is configured properly. I currently have a very minimal test > which creates a node via the Sling POST servlet and then reads that node > with the JCR API (via DavEx). do you mean something different that the jcr-test and the jcr2spi tests? the first one would be covered by org.apache.jackrabbit.test.JCRTestSuite the latter by org.apache.jackrabbit.jcr2spi.Jcr2SpiTestSuite there is also a limited amount of tests that directly operation on the SPI level and some specific tests for spi2davex: org.apache.jackrabbit.spi2davex.TestAll i'm currently trying to gather a complete list of known issues with respect to the jcr-tests used in the ConformanceTest in jcr2dav, that would us allow to run the integration tests on a regular, automated basis in order to detect problems as early as possible. hope that helps angela