jackrabbit-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Thomas Müller <thomas.muel...@day.com>
Subject Re: [jr3] MicroKernel prototype
Date Thu, 18 Mar 2010 10:24:02 GMT

> it's too early IMO to judge whether a caching hierarchy manager is
> needed or not...
> IMO the only statement that can be made based on your comparison
> is that if the prototype with very limited functionality were slower than
> jackrabbit with a fully implemented feature set, the protoype's architecture
> would probably need to be reconsidered ;)

I agree.

> - security
> - locking
> - scalability (number of concurrent sessions and repository size)
> - transactions

OK, I will then try to implement (prototype) those features now.

> very flat hierarchies

Yes. We do want to solve that, it will affect the architecture, and we
don't have much experience yet how to best solve it. So I guess it's
also one of the features that should be implemented early.


View raw message