From dev-return-27012-apmail-jackrabbit-dev-archive=jackrabbit.apache.org@jackrabbit.apache.org Mon Feb 08 07:54:13 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 47632 invoked from network); 8 Feb 2010 07:54:13 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Feb 2010 07:54:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 66684 invoked by uid 500); 8 Feb 2010 07:54:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-dev-archive@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 66607 invoked by uid 500); 8 Feb 2010 07:54:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@jackrabbit.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 66599 invoked by uid 99); 8 Feb 2010 07:54:11 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 08 Feb 2010 07:54:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of tmueller@day.com designates 207.126.148.87 as permitted sender) Received: from [207.126.148.87] (HELO eu3sys201aog101.obsmtp.com) (207.126.148.87) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Mon, 08 Feb 2010 07:54:03 +0000 Received: from source ([209.85.218.223]) by eu3sys201aob101.postini.com ([207.126.154.11]) with SMTP ID DSNKS2/DAxryIh+dOyMeRfTgstxLC6IfjHGF@postini.com; Mon, 08 Feb 2010 07:53:43 UTC Received: by bwz23 with SMTP id 23so865221bwz.1 for ; Sun, 07 Feb 2010 23:53:39 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.16.66 with SMTP id n2mr2275497bka.67.1265615619617; Sun, 07 Feb 2010 23:53:39 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <29110a0e1002051436h45c1f396yefa5efa7ec8e0019@mail.gmail.com> References: <29110a0e1002051436h45c1f396yefa5efa7ec8e0019@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2010 08:53:39 +0100 Message-ID: <91f3b2651002072353x7ecf1fe8i7eb2b2d6059f5af6@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Upgrade from 1.5.5 to 2.0.0 was unsuccessful in clustered environment: Cause: java.sql.SQLException: Lock wait timeout exceeded; Any ideas? From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Thomas_M=FCller?= To: dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi, Please use the 'user' list for questions. > the lock timeouts are occurring only with non-jcr tables during routine actions in other areas of our site, even though they have nothing to do with Jackrabbit. It sounds like the problem is not related to Jackrabbit then. > disabling jackrabbit solved the problem It could be due to lower database activity. What happens if you use two independent databases? Regards, Thomas