jackrabbit-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Alexander Klimetschek <aklim...@day.com>
Subject Re: [jr3] EventJournal / who merges changes
Date Thu, 25 Feb 2010 12:39:51 GMT
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 13:28, Michael Dürig <michael.duerig@day.com> wrote:
> I like this approach. In general I think merging is very difficult if not
> impossible at all to get right and will always be based on some assumptions
> (intended semantics). I think we should not put this burden onto the
> micro-kernel but rather leave it to higher levels (or even end users) to do
> the/some merging.

Doing so wouldn't prevent a specific micro-kernel implementation from
still trying to do a merge? Because I think this could still be
interesting when following eventual consistency models with
distributed cluster nodes.


Alexander Klimetschek

View raw message