jackrabbit-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Marcel Reutegger <marcel.reuteg...@gmx.net>
Subject Re: Jackrabbit 3: extracting same name sibling support from the core
Date Fri, 19 Feb 2010 16:25:15 GMT
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 14:25, Thomas Müller <thomas.mueller@day.com> wrote:
> Hi,
> A very simple implementation of my idea:
> http://h2database.com/p.html#e5e5d0fa3aabc42932e6065a37b1f6a8
> The method hasSameNameSibling() that is called for each remove(). If
> it turns out to be a performance problem we could add a hidden
> property in the first SNS node itself (only required there).
> Does anybody see any other obvious problems?

a remove or reorder potentially modifies lots of existing nodes. but
that's probably what you mean when you say "there is a risk that
certain things would get a bit slower if SNS are actually used".


> Regards,
> Thomas

View raw message