jackrabbit-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Michael Dürig <michael.due...@day.com>
Subject Re: [jr3] EventJournal / who merges changes
Date Thu, 25 Feb 2010 12:58:38 GMT
Alexander Klimetschek wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 13:28, Michael Dürig <michael.duerig@day.com> wrote:
>> I like this approach. In general I think merging is very difficult if not
>> impossible at all to get right and will always be based on some assumptions
>> (intended semantics). I think we should not put this burden onto the
>> micro-kernel but rather leave it to higher levels (or even end users) to do
>> the/some merging.
> Doing so wouldn't prevent a specific micro-kernel implementation from
> still trying to do a merge? Because I think this could still be
> interesting when following eventual consistency models with
> distributed cluster nodes.

Sure but I think we should restrict this to the cases where 1) the merge 
semantics is 'obivious' and 2) the performance hit is neglectable.


View raw message