From dev-return-26329-apmail-jackrabbit-dev-archive=jackrabbit.apache.org@jackrabbit.apache.org Fri Nov 27 17:07:48 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 96884 invoked from network); 27 Nov 2009 17:07:48 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 27 Nov 2009 17:07:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 39342 invoked by uid 500); 27 Nov 2009 17:07:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-dev-archive@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 39266 invoked by uid 500); 27 Nov 2009 17:07:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@jackrabbit.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 39246 invoked by uid 99); 27 Nov 2009 17:07:47 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 Nov 2009 17:07:47 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of mrduguo@gmail.com designates 72.14.220.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [72.14.220.155] (HELO fg-out-1718.google.com) (72.14.220.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 Nov 2009 17:07:43 +0000 Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id e12so682862fga.1 for ; Fri, 27 Nov 2009 09:07:21 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=lcZ7aPvvGlZYzU0V+Y6JTCWN/bagWKxRKZ459rjJOik=; b=hnVkSeE2Ef9f1xGNLGI/73WjLU7GthgxR0YFVkEMQdMGQQ9HPzzZUS40yWeUhAUnLi Qs8HILBW0k9uQq8uc8qLEHTPz/MBwPU43f84S3MQV8SXe63F6/Bd2UxfksvQVFzD/VS5 SWPny/L+cHvZRHY9Zc32lUvg/ZlPWYrnT3eSo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=TSDFrEx/ZnJ2febE4pdkk1J/9yCst0xYIP3QEueDXfo5fK1gcReLKdUbdNSHnJmfQ5 IPSBHfUZlqYfJbBlhphfPQAAUsyGePzjZOMMgw2ilNk4bunafJMtl7nLPqH2RUTQTJyR HgeK9P3HdpRad9AwUifI7PUIm9cvpS2OR5qGE= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.102.236.11 with SMTP id j11mr450352muh.3.1259341641120; Fri, 27 Nov 2009 09:07:21 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4B0FD916.5080102@gmail.com> References: <4B0FD916.5080102@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 17:07:21 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Sling's use of Jackrabbit From: Guo Du To: dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi Felix, It's really necessary to get jackrabbit OSGified. As OSGi get very popular those days. If we don't do it from JR, all other people like sling will do it there. We just add correct OSGi headers all JR projects and that's it. By this way, JR won't affect on it's standalone application as well. For all external dependencies, it's up to the end user to get it when deploy to OSGi runtime. Sling is a better place than JR to host OSGified dependencies. -Guo On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 1:50 PM, Felix Meschberger wrote: > I have started a thread in the Apache Sling project regarding the future > of the Jackrabbit-based OSGi bundles we maintain [1]. > > One option (out of my belly) could be to create an OSGi subproject in > Jackrabbit which would host these bundles. > > You are invited to follow this discussion and of coure also share your > opinions. > > Should the result of the Sling discussion be to "donate" some or all of > the bundles to the Jackrabbit project, I will come back to officially > offer these bundles to the Jackrabbit community. > > Regards > Felix > > [1] http://markmail.org/thread/vechl274bewkh4o6