jackrabbit-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Thomas Müller <thomas.muel...@day.com>
Subject Re: Sling's use of Jackrabbit
Date Mon, 30 Nov 2009 13:23:38 GMT
Hi,

>> I would not move the API to the Jackrabbit API. Just moving the
>> interfaces into sepatate packages, eg. below o.a.j.core.api would
>> suffice it to export this space and leave the implementation private.
>
> +1
>
> Moving the persistence manager interface and co (basically everything
> that can be swapped by custom implementations in the repository.xml)
> into a separate API package is a good idea. But it makes sense to
> separate this from the client-side API in jackabbit-api and only have
> this as an exported package in jackrabbit-core.

-1

As I already wrote, it doesn't make sense to do that now. We can still
do that later on, when there is actually somebody that needs it.

Regards,
Thomas

Mime
View raw message