jackrabbit-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Felix Meschberger <fmesc...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Sling's use of Jackrabbit
Date Fri, 27 Nov 2009 19:48:53 GMT
Hi,

That's exactly why I intent to go this route.

But it is important to understand that there are some use cases for
dynamic configurability of the embedded Jackrabbit instance which we
will have to ensure in the future.

Regards
Felix

Guo Du schrieb:
> Hi Felix,
> 
> It's really necessary to get jackrabbit OSGified. As OSGi get very
> popular those days. If we don't do it from JR, all other people like
> sling will do it there.
> 
> We just add correct OSGi headers all JR projects and that's it. By
> this way, JR won't affect on it's standalone application as well.
> 
> For all external dependencies, it's up to the end user to get it when
> deploy to OSGi runtime. Sling is a better place than JR to host
> OSGified dependencies.
> 
> -Guo
> 
> 
> On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 1:50 PM, Felix Meschberger <fmeschbe@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I have started a thread in the Apache Sling project regarding the future
>> of the Jackrabbit-based OSGi bundles we maintain [1].
>>
>> One option (out of my belly) could be to create an OSGi subproject in
>> Jackrabbit which would host these bundles.
>>
>> You are invited to follow this discussion and of coure also share your
>> opinions.
>>
>> Should the result of the Sling discussion be to "donate" some or all of
>> the bundles to the Jackrabbit project, I will come back to officially
>> offer these bundles to the Jackrabbit community.
>>
>> Regards
>> Felix
>>
>> [1] http://markmail.org/thread/vechl274bewkh4o6
> 

Mime
View raw message