From dev-return-25506-apmail-jackrabbit-dev-archive=jackrabbit.apache.org@jackrabbit.apache.org Thu Sep 17 13:34:25 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 54940 invoked from network); 17 Sep 2009 13:34:25 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Sep 2009 13:34:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 13477 invoked by uid 500); 17 Sep 2009 13:34:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-dev-archive@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 13409 invoked by uid 500); 17 Sep 2009 13:34:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@jackrabbit.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 13387 invoked by uid 99); 17 Sep 2009 13:34:23 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 13:34:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jukka.zitting@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.182 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.210.182] (HELO mail-yx0-f182.google.com) (209.85.210.182) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 13:34:14 +0000 Received: by yxe12 with SMTP id 12so51142yxe.1 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 06:33:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=QVeM5efa3Mp/yfjLV8tcjf2PnvExX8LXEmuvm+hJv8w=; b=eRwD6bAxxvfcmIMVcn14jPZgZ7tCbpXYC5/ZXqHpQjfNLglpUDUuOPiRptS/K3OD4I zS4RQ4jHnKqNXFi20+ZKqcJ3Ay6WF3d7U4Hrfmmq6r4qNKoN7xFPLllZd72owvhdbwEp ON+H0eMXlF8C8Ye50KEgiPNliP9ortd4yaJAk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; b=l53IPYD224cpkYTS2onT681CH0g2KqcBJ1l+YSpoie6V8w0MKs5CFTBKC/nKE/O3r+ lXz23CZK7h+rhb6A8k86SY+4ek0ZsX1oleteA9VaUhv1RqIgRh+Gbpwsdd5S3nd+JXND A5Mxj/cmjGZ06h0Cco4QTNa5vnY0otsJB2xBo= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.100.74.13 with SMTP id w13mr59043ana.168.1253194433111; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 06:33:53 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <510143ac0909160201i27892846l2ac05a732486b101@mail.gmail.com> References: <510143ac0904210839x4290df14y11f9964541c76440@mail.gmail.com> <510143ac0908051027w7bc7c38cx7a4ec58433898a71@mail.gmail.com> <510143ac0908120328i75ef7712u666b9c7d3d5991e9@mail.gmail.com> <510143ac0908180844o77cc7442t9d2165c869445982@mail.gmail.com> <510143ac0909160201i27892846l2ac05a732486b101@mail.gmail.com> From: Jukka Zitting Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 15:33:33 +0200 Message-ID: <510143ac0909170633r15bb323fq4a1bca944ad12051@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Jackrabbit 2.0 release plan To: Jackrabbit Developers Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi, On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 11:01 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote: > I haven't yet looked in detail at all the open feature issues we have, > but it would be really cool if we could have Jackrabbit 2.0 released > by the ApacheCon US in early November. That would give us essentially > one month time for any remaining work in trunk. Improvements that > don't make it to svn by that time can be postponed to 2.1. I talked with Angela who would rather not set a fixed release date before the security code has settled down to something we are comfortable with for the entire 2.x cycle. It's a good point, so I'm inclined to wait until the security code has stabilized. I'll keep you posted on any updates to this. BR, Jukka Zitting