jackrabbit-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Marcel Reutegger <marcel.reuteg...@gmx.net>
Subject Re: Question: Jackrabbit on Oracle - oracle indexing rather than lucene's?
Date Tue, 29 Sep 2009 13:14:57 GMT
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 14:00, Alexander Klimetschek <aklimets@day.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 13:09, David Wagener <David.Wagener@awi.de> wrote:
>> But when I compare the performance of both solutions, the search module
>> based on “Bundle File-System” is faster than running search module on
>> “Bundle Database PM”.
>
> The (lucene) search index implementation is independent from the
> persistence manager. Search times should have the same speed if the
> content and the queries are the same.
>
> The only difference could be in the time it takes to index data, as
> that depends on the latency of the pm.

and the time to read the items of the result set from the PM.

regards
 marcel

>> My Question: What about storing data in oracle? is there a possibility to
>> use oracle indexing rather than lucene's?
>
> Not easily. The search index implementation is made purely for JCR, to
> support property and full-text indexing plus all the special features
> as described in the spec. And Lucene, especially if the index is kept
> locally as now, is faster as an Oracle based index... at least I would
> guess so.
>
> Oracle itself offers a JCR binding (they were part of the standards
> committee), but only for their XML db AFAIK and I don't know if they
> support the full JCR search features.
>
> Regards,
> Alex
>
> --
> Alexander Klimetschek
> alexander.klimetschek@day.com
>

Mime
View raw message